Turkic Mythology Codexery

Irk Bitig

9th-century Old Turkic divination manuscript from Dunhuang.

Irk Bitig (Old Turkic: 𐰃𐰺𐰴 𐰋𐰃𐱅𐰃𐰏), also known as the Book of Omens or Book of Divination, is a 9th-century manuscript on divination discovered in the 'Library Cave' of the Mogao Caves in Dunhuang, China, by Aurel Stein in 1907. It is the only known complete manuscript text written in the Old Turkic script (Orkhon or Turkic runes) and is an important source for early Turkic mythology.

Date
9th or 10th century (year of the tiger; debated: 810–894 or 930/942)
Script
Old Turkic script (Orkhon runes)
Language
Old Turkic (Manichaean dialect per von Gabain; secular per Clauson)
Material
Manuscript booklet, 58 folios, each page ~13.1 × 8.1 cm
Location
British Library, London (shelfmark Or.8212/161)
Known for
Only complete manuscript in Old Turkic script; 65 divination omens with prognostics

Lore & Background

The title 'Irk Bitig' (Book of Omens) appears at the bottom of the last page of the main text (folio 55b), but the author is not named. The colophon states it was written on the 15th day of the second month of the year of the tiger at the Taygüntan (Chinese: 大雲堂) Manichaean monastery by an anonymous monk for his 'elder brother', General İtaçuk (Saŋun İtaçuk). The Library Cave was sealed in the early 11th century, so the year of the tiger is thought to be in the 9th or 10th centuries. Louis Bazin suggests 930 or 942; Gerard Clauson and Talat Tekin date it to the 9th century (e.g., 810, 822, 834, 846, 858, 870, 882, or 894).

Reader's Guide

The Irk Bitig is significant as the only complete manuscript in the Old Turkic script, providing a unique window into the language, mythology, and divination practices of early Turkic peoples. Its 65 omens, each headed by groups of one to four red circles (thought to represent dice pips), offer short narratives about nomadic life, featuring animals (domestic and wild), the Sky God Tengri, and the Khan. The omens are classified as good, very good, bad, or very bad. The text exhibits poetic features such as parallelism, alliteration, and rhyme, despite lacking a fixed metre. Linguistically, it shows orthographic peculiarities (e.g., front vowel forms of s and n in back-vowel contexts) and unique signs (for 'ot' and syllabic 'up'). Transcription errors suggest it is a copy of an earlier text, probably in Old Uyghur script. The work is a key source for early Turkic mythology and the Manichaean context of the monastery where it was copied.

Did You Know?

More in Turkic mythology 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →